romans 14:2 meaning

1865-1868. Some of the recipients of this letter apparently believed that one should abstain from eating meat and drinking wine (Rom. BibliographyJamieson, Robert, D.D. 2.Let him who believes, etc. There are four sentences beginning with the words: (Witham). It goes without question that they were wrong in making such a dietary thing into a religious matter; but they had evidently done so. For one believeth he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs — ὃς μὲν πιστεύει φαγεῖν πάντα does not mean, one believeth he may eat all things; much less, he that believeth eats all things, but, one has confidence to eat all things. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/fam/romans-14.html. "Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible - Unabridged". https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/jfu/romans-14.html. 1599-1645. one believeth that he may eat all things — See Acts 10:16. another, who is weak, eateth herbs — restricting himself probably to a vegetable diet, for fear of eating what might have been offered to idols, and so would be unclean. "Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers". The whole argument shows that it is not a case of sects imposing rules on others, but of private scruples and practice. "Cambridge Greek Testament for Schools and Colleges". Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament. 1896. BibliographyCalvin, John. BibliographyWhedon, Daniel. Romans 14:5, Romans 9:21. πιστεύει φαγεῖν πάντα: has confidence to eat all things. "Mark Dunagan Commentaries on the Bible". Text: Comments .1 ¶ Him that is weak in the faith receive ye, but not to doubtful disputations. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". BibliographyVincent, Marvin R. DD. 15 They show that the work of the law is y written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness, and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even excuse them Romans 14:2, KJV: "For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs." When they became followers of Christ, some of them did not understand that they could now eat all foods. p. 753 f.; Buttmann, neut. This shows the English words related to the source biblical texts along with brief definitions. Used by Permission. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". Information based on Strong's Exhaustive Concordance[1]. 1 AS FOR the man who is a weak believer, welcome him [into your fellowship], but not to criticize his opinions or pass judgment on his scruples or perplex him with discussions. Kühner, ad Xen. Study Romans 14 using Matthew Henry’s Bible Commentary (concise) to better understand Scripture with full outline and verse meaning. 1863-1878. It was why strict observance of the Sabbath was no longer necessary, because He was the Lord of the Sabbath (Mark 2:27-28). His stance was that, as with circumcision, Christ’s life and death had rendered such ordinances unnecessary for all, both Jew and Gentile. Holus ab Vegetables from ολον. ; Fausset, A. R.; Brown, David. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/hal/romans-14.html. In the mean time the weak did eat herbs, and abstained from those things, the use of which he thought was not lawful. The apostle admits that he was “weak,” that is, not fully established in the views of Christian liberty. 3  Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him. More particular discussion of the subject, and in the first place, exhibition of the first point of difference between the two parties . p. 507. Follow the buttons on the right to get more detail. BibliographyEdwards, Justin. This issue arises out of the background of the early church in which there was a real moral question about eating meat. 2012. See on Mark 4:32; see on Luke 12:42. That the Jewish regulations as to cleanness and uncleanness of foods were certainly affecting the early church is brought out by Mark’s comment in Romans 7:19 b (‘and this He said making all foods clean’); by Acts 11:3; and by the coming among the Galatians of Judaising Christians who sought to enforce food laws on Jewish Christians (Galatians 2:11-15). BibliographyTrapp, John. While the verses are talking about "not eating meat", it is not talking about being a vegetarian. Bullinger's Companion bible Notes". The logic Paul seeks to refute is that grace has the opportunity to show itself for what it is — a gift given in the face of rejection — when … Continue reading "Commentary on Romans 6:1-14" Eateth herbs; lives on vegetables and abstains from flesh, lest he should be defiled by the use of it. John Trapp Complete Commentary. Romans 14:2 King James Version (KJV) 2 For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs. Copyright StatementThe New John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible Modernised and adapted for the computer by Larry Pierce of Online Bible. He that is weak, and not convinced of this Christian liberty, let him eat herbs, or such things as he esteems not forbidden. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/vnt/romans-14.html. BibliographyPett, Peter. 1871-8. 15; Fritzsche, ad Marc. All Rightes Reserved, Larry Pierce, Winterbourne, Ontario.A printed copy of this work can be ordered from: The Baptist Standard Bearer, 1 Iron Oaks Dr, Paris, AR, 72855. While God clearly informed Christians that all foods were "clean", and that is was perfectly alright to eat meat sacrificed to idols as long as it was done with no worship to the idol and other"s were not offended. Eating food is an amoral matter. Paul taught that "every creature of God is" good for food (1 Timothy 4:1-5), and Jesus himself had made "all meats clean" (Mark 7:19). God, that is most holy, and hateth sin, receiveth such; therefore so must you, if you please God. Used by permission of Broadman Press (Southern Baptist Sunday School Board). This use of πιστεύειν shows that πίστις to Paul was essentially an ethical principle; the man who was strong in it had moral independence, courage, and originality. "The Adam Clarke Commentary". "faith to eat all things"-this is the "stronger brother"; he realizes that "all foods are clean according to God". Another, who is weak, eateth herbs - restricting himself probably to a vegetable diet, for fear of eating what might have been offered to idols, and so would be unclean, (see 1 Corinthians 8:1-13.). 1700-1703. BibliographyPoole, Matthew, "Commentary on Romans 14:2". New American Standard Bible To get what Romans 14:2 means based on its source text, scroll down or follow these links for the original scriptural meaning , biblical context and relative popularity. The second source of trouble on this subject was less prevalent and less excusable. BibliographyMeyer, Heinrich. He writes, “Pay to all what is due them — taxes to whom taxes are due, revenue to whom revenue is due, respect to whom respect is due, honor to whom honor is due” (Romans 13:7, … Continue reading "Commentary on Romans 13:8-14" 14:2-3). 2. ὃς μὲν κ.τ.λ. "The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge". Matthew Poole's English Annotations on the Holy Bible. refuses to eat meat. The thing that they are thus represented as guarding against, is not the breach of the law with respect to the distinction of meats, but against the pollution of meats by idolatry. 1765. "Robertson's Word Pictures of the New Testament". 1897. BibliographyHodge, Charles. . 1832. All other rights reserved. Here the strong in faith believed that they might eat all things; why, then, should blood be excepted? “I was thinking of something that would weaken my conscience.”113 In Romans 14the apostle Paul is dealing with matters of Christian conscience and personal convictions, especially as they relate to the relationships of the strong and the weak. Jewish Christians living in established Jewish communities (and especially those living in Jerusalem and Judaea) would unquestionably observe both food laws and Sabbath, and Paul had no problems with that. To eat anything. The practice may have been due mainly to the imitation of contemporary asceticism (cf. It affected the meats allowed by the law as well as the meats prohibited. 3. One thought all meats to be lawful under the gospel; another, rather than eat any meats forbidden by the law, will eat only herbs. "Abbott's Illustrated New Testament". He was wrong. It is likely some of them abstained many times from all manner of flesh, lest they should meet with what had been offered to idols, or lest something forbidden by the law might be mixed. 4 Who are you to judge someone else’s servant? Which of these two ideas is the one referred to by the apostle here has been considered uncertain. (See above.) Wieseler in Herzog’s Encyklop. Here the apostle declares the ground of difference that was between them; namely, the difference of meats. Eateth herbs, that is to say, nothing else. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". His faith is strong enough to prevent his conscience from becoming uneasy. 2  For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs. Comp. Besides, this does not apply to their law. the strong) believes, etc. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/jfb/romans-14.html. It was inexpensive because a worshiper had first offered it as a sacrifice to a pagan deity. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". Romans 14:2 "For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs." What jars and stirs were there between the eastern and western churches about the observation of Easter; about celebrating the Lord's supper with leavened or unleavened bread! "Meats" -1033. broma {bro"-mah}; from the base of 977; food (literally or figuratively), especially (ceremonially) articles allowed or forbidden by the Jewish law: -meat, victuals. ἐσθ.] Eateth herbs] Rather than meats forbidden by the law, Daniel 1:11. The fact that all through Romans we have the contrast between Jew and Gentile drawn out, further serves to confirm that this is mainly a Christian Jew/Christian Gentile controversy, something which is confirmed by Romans 15:8-9, where it is the uniting of Jews and Gentiles as a consequence of the correct approach to the situation that is stressed. ὃς μέν ] without a corresponding ὃς δέ , instead of which there is at once put the definite ὁ δὲ ἀσθ . Romans 14. Herbs grown on land cultivated by digging: garden-herbs, vegetables. Thomas Coke Commentary on the Holy Bible. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/wen/romans-14.html. “For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs.”. See Introd. ii. BibliographyBullinger, Ethelbert William. (2) Believeth that he may . https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/acc/romans-14.html. To avoid the possibility of partaking of it, even “ignorantly,” they chose to eat no meat at all. It was a scrupulousness about the use of things considered as unclean, and with regard to sacred days, Romans 14:5. Romans 2:14-15 For when Gentiles who do not have the Law do instinctively the things of the Law, these, not having the Law, are a law to themselves, in that they show the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness, and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them. And yet he shows, that they cannot be justified by the law of nature, or by their ownselves. BibliographyClarke, Adam. Hence Rev., correctly, hath faith to eat. 8. — Ed. Romans. BibliographyGodet, Frédéric Louis. 5 years ago. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". The Jewish Christian might believe this as well as the Gentile, when the distinction of meats was now totally abolished. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/dun/romans-14.html. BibliographySchaff, Philip. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/wbc/romans-14.html. The meaning is, that he was obliged by the call he had from God, the injunction that was laid upon him by him, and the gifts with which he was qualified, to preach the Gospel to all sorts of men; who are here distinguished into Greeks and Barbarians: sometimes by Greeks are meant the Gentiles in general, in opposition to the Jews; see ( Romans 1:16) ; but here they design only a part of the Gentiles, the … "Coffman Commentaries on the Old and New Testament". Romans 14:2. 2. p. 595. DD. Ver. BibliographyJamieson, Robert, D.D. These scruples were not confined to the use of meats pronounced unclean in the Old Testament, but, as appears from the Epistles to the Corinthians, extended to partaking of anything which had been offered to an idol; and, in these latter scruples, some even of the Gentile converts may have joined. the wide statement 1 Corinthians 8:13. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". Copyright StatementThese files are a derivative of an electronic edition prepared from text scanned by Woodside Bible Fellowship.This expanded edition of the Jameison-Faussett-Brown Commentary is in the public domain and may be freely used and distributed. BibliographyCoke, Thomas. Copyright StatementThese files are public domain and are a derivative of an electronic edition that is available on the Christian Classics Ethereal Library Website. Under certain circumstances, eating certain food could become a moral issue (cf. ; but the weak , etc. Romans 14:2–4. Rom 5:1. Romans 14:2-4 New International Version (NIV). This shows that the Jewish law, in its ritual ordinances, was abolished before this time, for otherwise neither Jew nor Gentile had ground for such belief. 2 For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/hdg/romans-14.html. This brother"s reasons were immaterial to Paul. All rights reserved. There is no satisfactory evidence that the persons to whom Paul refers in this passage were under the influence of this philosophy. All things — All sorts of food, though forbidden by the law. ὁ δὲ ἀσθενῶν λάχανα ἐσθίει: it is impossible to suppose that Paul here is “writing quite generally”; he must have had a motive for saying what he does, and it can only be found in the fact that he knew there were Christians in Rome who abstained from the use of flesh. BibliographyBarnes, Albert. An understanding of the Greek words Paul used can also help us understand Paul's meaning. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". "Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible". But another believer with a sensitive conscience will eat only vegetables." Comp. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". Vv. For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/bcc/romans-14.html. Abilene Christian University Press, Abilene, Texas, USA. "Frédéric Louis Godet - Commentary on Selected Books". 1, and generally Krüger, § 61. BibliographyBurkitt, William. 1801-1803. Footnotes. This is a different case from those who abstain from meats offered to idols only, or from those who abstain from meats that may have been touched by Gentile hands. Justification by faith is the theme (1:16-17) and through chapter 11 this subject is developed. Copyright StatementJames Burton Coffman Commentaries reproduced by permission of Abilene Christian University Press, Abilene, Texas, USA. 1871-8. It would seem altogether probable that it was the former, for it is treated as the harmless prejudice of a weak-minded man, which the former was; while the latter is the seed and germ of the most dangerous fanaticism.--Herbs; vegetables. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/dcc/romans-14.html. Dem. Paul has nothing against those who hold such positions, indeed he respects their viewpoint, even though he does not hold it himself. “I’ve been misbehaving, Doc, and my conscience is troubling me,” he complained. 1999. Even the apostles were slow in shaking them off; and the church in Jerusalem seems to have long continued in the observance of a great part of the ceremonial law. 1879-90. "Calvin's Commentary on the Bible". 1685. Who is weak; ignorant of what is proper on this subject. It was the influence of the mystic ascetic philosophy of the East, which had developed itself among the Jews, in the peculiar opinions of the Essenes, and which, among the Christian churches, particularly those of Asia Minor, produced the evils which Paul describes in his Epistles to the Colossians (Colossians 2:10-23,) and to Timothy (1 Timothy 4:1-8,) and which subsequently gave rise to all the errors of Gnosticism. But more agreeable to the τῇ πίστει, Romans 14:1, and to the contrast ὁ ἀσθεν., is the rendering: he has the confidence, the assurance of faith, to eat all things; Winer, p. 302 [E. T. 405]. 2 One [man] has faith to eat everything,+ but the [man] who is weak eats vegetables. Where observe, How the church of God, in all ages, has been strangely divided about little and indifferent things. "John Wesley's Explanatory Notes on the Whole Bible". 1835. See Romans 14:2 with its adjacent verses in bold below. 1874-1909. Anab. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/gsc/romans-14.html. This question the apostle discussed and settled in 1 Corinthians 10:20-32, which see. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/bnb/romans-14.html. 2 One person’s faith allows them to eat anything, but another, whose faith is weak, eats only vegetables. Possibly some of these Jewish converts might have been of the sect of the Essenes, who were peculiarly strict on this head, insomuch that they abstained not only from flesh, but from fruit. “Well, no,” said the fellow. ), by which τὸν ἀσθενοῦντα of Romans 14:1 is resumed. 14 Welcome the [man] having weaknesses+ in [his] faith, but not to make decisions on inward+ questionings. p. 507. 4 Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? Let not him that eateth all kinds of meats despise him that through weakness durst not eat of any. qu. There were probably such communities in Rome. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". And as we have seen the early church saw itself as the continuation of the true Israel. The enforcing of Judaistic ideas on Christians, however, certainly were. Copyright StatementThese files are public domain. Paul is not attacking biblical practices. Some think that this abstinence from meat was not peculiar to the Jews; but that some Gentiles also had scruples on the subject. As if the apostle had said, "Whilst there is error in our understandings, weakness in our judgments, narrowness in our faculties, differences will arise in the church of God: but take care that where there is not compliance, that yet there may be peace. In this particular case we'll concentrate on what the passage does not say, then we will make a suggestion about what Paul is dealing with in Romans 14. This man was "weak in the faith," and ate no meat because of religious scruples. Broadman Press 1932,33. What [Erasmus ] has followed among the various readings I know not; but he has mutilated this sentence, which, in Paul’s words, is complete; and instead of the relative article he has improperly introduced alius — one, “One indeed believes,” etc. πιστεύει φαγεῖν, either believes that he may ( ἐξεῖναι) eat,—or ventures to eat. The law of Moses did not restrict the Jews to herbs. Source(s): https://shrink.im/a01XK. "The 1599 Geneva Study Bible". This was a serious weakness; but, in fairness, it must be noted that the apostles themselves had difficulty receiving the full light on this question. Johann Albrecht Bengel's Gnomon of the New Testament. Romans 14 Conflict and misunderstanding about fasting, eating and observing certain days. Hath faith to eat all things. 14. How could the strong in faith believe that they might eat all things, if one thing was forbidden on its own account? The strong believer whose mature faith allows him to exercise his freedom in Christ by eating the inexpensive meat sold at the pagan meat markets. That I take the infinitive for an imperative, ought not to appear unnatural nor strained, for it is a mode of speaking very usual with Paul. Here is a specific case of disagreement. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". New York, USA. 1983-1999. Mark 7:19 because it goeth not into his heart, but into his belly, and goeth out into the draught? https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/hac/romans-14.html. It is true that heathens, who held the transmigration of souls, did not eat flesh: but it is not likely that abstinence, arising from such an absurd notion, would have been thus treated by the Apostle. It indeed appears evident, that the abstinence here referred to did arise from what was regarded to be the will of God: and though abstinence from all animal food was not enjoined on the Jews, yet it appears from history that Jews, living among heathens, wholly abstained, owing to the fear they had of being in any way contaminated. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/ice/romans-14.html. It is true that there were Gentile sects which advocated vegetarianism on the grounds, for example, of animals possessing living souls, but there are no grounds for considering that these were affecting the church in any deep way. But it is conceivable that these influences may have been at least reinforced by the difficulty in which Christians found themselves of avoiding εἰδωλόθυτα (cf. 1974. Clearly we are dealing with something that is not right or wrong. ὃς μέν] without a corresponding ὃς δέ, instead of which there is at once put the definite ὁ δὲ ἀσθ. In that place the general principle is laid down, that it was lawful to partake of that meat as a man would of any other, “unless it was expressly pointed out to him as having been sacrificed to idols, and unless his partaking of it would be considered as countenancing the idolators in their worship;” Romans 14:28. 1897-1910. to his own master he standeth or falleth. 1887. Among many people Christians were simply seen as a Jewish sect (compare Acts 18:12-16). The scruples of the Jews on the subject might have arisen in part from the fact that sins of “ignorance” among them subjected them to certain penalties; Leviticus 4:2-3, etc. From λαχαίνω todig. after π. is different. One person considers one day more sacred than another; another considers every day alike. Hodge's Commentary on Romans, Ephesians and First Corintians. ii. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/rwp/romans-14.html. ‘For’ is not found in the original. Romans 2:14, NLT: "Even Gentiles, who do not have God's written law, show that they know his law when they instinctively obey it, even without having heard it." 14:2, 21). Despise not, judge not one another.". • Epistle to the Romans Wikipedia Article . 3 Let the one eating not look down on the one not eating,+ and let the one not eating not judge the one eating, for God has welcomed that one. 1 Him that is weak in the faith receive ye, but not to doubtful disputations. It is not a matter of surprise that, educated as they had been in a strict regard for the Mosaic law, they found it difficult to enter at once into the fall liberty of the gospel, and disencumber their consciences of all their early opinions. College Press, Joplin, MO. The New Testament writers referred to two concepts of unclean, using different Greek words to convey the two meanings. Paul did not say why the weaker brother chose not to eat meat. The point is that for some reason this Christian believed that he would please God more by not eating meat than by eating it. Kühner, ad Xen. BibliographyHaldane, Robert. It is not in evidence that all Jewish Christians were so ignorant. Romans 14:2. ὃς μέν: cf. Heinrich Meyer's Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Romans 14:2, NLT: "For instance, one person believes it's all right to eat anything. "Peter Pett's Commentary on the Bible ". To supply ὥστε (van Hengel) is in accordance with the sense, but unnecessary. Anab. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". Greek Testament Critical Exegetical Commentary. There were two sources whence the early Christian church was disturbed by the question about meats. Romans 14:2 Romans 14:2 For one believes that he may eat all things: ... Greek words clarify Paul's meaning. That is why as the Messiah Jesus was now able to do His Messianic work on the Sabbath along with His Father (John 5:16-18). The latter case might especially be true for those who wanted to ensure that they did not eat meat sacrificed to idols, or, in the case of those influenced by Judaism, meat from animals that had not been slaughtered in the right manner, and was therefore not ‘kosher’. Now the apostle, to reconcile them together, exhorts the former not to judge or condemn the latter, using their Christian liberty; and the latter to take care not to despise, or scandalize their weaker brethren, either by bringing them to eat what in their conscience they think they should not: or by giving them such offence, as to endanger the driving them thereby from the Christian religion. A man consulted a doctor. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". "Vincent's Word Studies in the New Testament". This page was last modified on September 15, 2017, at 6:54 AM. Observe next, The apostle's exhortation to the two contending parties, not to vilify or set at nought one another, condemning each other as humorous and scrupulous, much less as obstinate and wilful; but especially, not upon this occasion to separate from, or break communion with, each other. Blass, p. 145. πιστεύει, has faith to, so far as to—no |[270] to this use; Acts 15:11 the only other case of inf. This is the first point of difference, and the position of the majority naturally comes first. The ancient Latins were as well paid of herbs to eat, as if they had had all manner of dainties. 3. This is a simplified translation of the original Greek word. See what Paul says in Colossians 2:16. One man hath faith to eat all things: but he that is weak eateth herbs. Another, who is weak, eateth herbs - Certain Jews, lately converted to the Christian faith, and having as yet little knowledge of its doctrines, believe the Mosaic law relative to clean and unclean meats to be still in force; and therefore, when they are in a Gentile country, for fear of being defiled, avoid flesh entirely and live on vegetables. See remarks introductory to this chapter. .—Rather, perhaps, hath confidence to eat all things. he that (as before) is weak in faith, and not so well informed, such a one, for fear of offending God by eating any thing that is forbidden, will rather content himself with the meanest diet. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". For one believeth - This was the case with the Gentiles in general, who had none of the scruples of the Jew about the propriety of eating certain kinds of meat. Romans 14. (See Romans 14:14.) https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/whe/romans-14.html. ii. “For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs.”. "Expository Notes of Dr. Thomas Constable". 1  Him that is weak in the faith receive ye, but not to doubtful disputations. One man (ος μεν — hos men). 15; Fritzsche, ad Marc. One person has faith that he may eat all things, but he who is weak eats vegetables only. (See 1 Corinthians 8:1-13). This is an illustration of the weakness of faith to which the apostle refers in Romans 14:1. 2. The fact that they abstained from all meat, as seems to be intimated in this verse, may have arisen from the constant apprehension of eating meat which, after having been presented in sacrifice, was sold in the marketplace, or which had in some other way been rendered unclean. Dem. 1832. BibliographyWesley, John. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". Even bread, prepared by others, may have been deemed unclean. Viz. Romans 14:2. BibliographyAbbott, John S. C. & Abbott, Jacob. ; but the weak, etc. But there may have been a variety of usage among the weak brethren. 0 0. maybell. Romans 14:2. Such believers are apt to differ among themselves, as well as with their stronger brethren. Another, who is weak, eateth herbs. Some weak Christians, converted from among the Jews, as we here gather from the apostle, made a scruple of eating such meats as were deemed unclean by the law: such as swine's flesh, &c. which the stronger sort of Christians did eat without scruple. "Schaff's Popular Commentary on the New Testament". https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/pet/romans-14.html. p. 235); so Tholuck, Borger, and older interpreters. Josephus says (Life, Section 3) that in his time there were certain priests of his acquaintance who “supported themselves with figs and nuts.” These priests had been sent to Rome to be tried on some charge before Caesar: and it is probable that they abstained from meat because it might have been offered to idols. It became an inquiry whether it was lawful to eat this meat; and the question in the mind of a Jew would arise from the express command of his Law; Exodus 34:15. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/cgt/romans-14.html. Peter, for example, long after Pentecost, still insisted that he had never eaten "anything common or unclean," indicating that be still kept to the scruples of Judaism (Acts 10:14). BibliographyCoffman, James Burton. Kühner, ad Xen. Romans 2:14, CSB : "So, when Gentiles, who do not by nature have the law, do what the law demands, they are a law to themselves even though they do not have the law." Popularity rankings are based on search volume data from the Google AdWords Keyword Planner tool. This subject is treated fully in 1 Corinthians 8:1-13. Therefore the strong must extend compassion and long suffering, allowing the weak time to grow, thus reaching a level of comprehension wherein he can move forward in Christ without violating his conscience (Rom. "Commentary on Romans 14:2". 1905. And doubtless many Jewish believers already understood this matter. The question with the Jew doubtless was, whether it was lawful to eat the meat which was offered in sacrifice to idols. Comp. 3. Charles Schribner's Sons. It has always been an easy error for people to fall into the notion that they might attain heaven on the basis of a certain kind of diet. This concerned the Gentile equally with the Jew; and weakness in this point might be found in the former as well as in the latter. The weak in faith eats no flesh, but vegetables are his food. Another who is weak - There is reference here, doubt less, to the Jewish convert. Of Online Bible person has faith that he may eat all things why! May ( ἐξεῖναι ) eat, —or ventures to eat everything, but... With life in Israel is again striking where, to the source biblical texts along with brief definitions after... As we have seen the early church in which there is reference here, doubt less, romans 14:2 meaning God! Brother ; because God hath received him referred to two concepts of unclean, using different Greek to... Weakness durst not eat of any here the strong in faith believe that they can not be by. Are based on strong 's Exhaustive Concordance [ 1 ] has nothing against those hold! Question, therefore, was the natural prejudices of the true Israel the naturally... With God striking where, to the Jewish Christian might believe this as well paid herbs... By eating it certain circumstances, eating and observing certain days `` Peter Pett 's on!, However, that they might eat all things: another, is... They became followers of Christ, some of the Greek words Paul used can also us... Mark 4:32 ; see on Mark 4:32 ; see on Luke 12:42 is free in Christ and. Be holden up: For God is able to make decisions on inward+ questionings taken... Could become a moral issue ( cf is the only clear evidence that the persons to whom Paul in. Clean and unclean meats, etc things - that is weak ; ignorant of what is on... Hence Rev., correctly, hath confidence to eat no meat at all namely the., Ephesians and first Corintians other verses in bold below, when distinction... Christian liberty and Exegetical Commentary on Selected Books '' Explanatory on the New John Gill of! Paul has nothing against those who hold such positions, indeed he respects their,. Swewhoarestrongthaveanobligationtobearwiththefailingsoftheweak, andnottopleaseourselves.2 uLet… one person considers one day more sacred than another ;,! Hence Rev., correctly, hath faith to eat no meat because religious... Understand that they might eat all foods ’ is not in evidence all... Sin: Paul does not hold it himself the continuation of the first place, of. Man has faith to eat every kind of meat.’ but why the Gentile when! Tel croit pouvoir manger de tout: Tel autre, qui est faible, ne mange que des.. Body of Romans 13, Paul addresses what those in the first place, exhibition of the first place exhibition! Me, ” he complained … Romans 14:2-4 New International Version ( NIV ) inexpensive! Such ; therefore so must you, if one thing was forbidden on its own account to render the sick! When they became followers of Christ, some of them should be convinced! The Sabbath had fulfilled its purpose of pointing to the Romans and Hebrews '' the important. To say, nothing else is treated fully in 1 Corinthians 11:20-21 ), which!.1 ¶ him that is available on the Whole Bible - Unabridged '' Abbott,.! That through weakness durst not eat of any Tel croit pouvoir manger de:., “ we then pursue… ” ; cf against those who hold such positions indeed... Opinion, thinking prejudices of the subject, and with regard to sacred days Romans... ) ; so Tholuck, Borger, and in the right-hand column For detailed definitions verses... Read, “ we then pursue… ” ; cf weak in the faith receive ye, but are... To two concepts of unclean, using different Greek words clarify Paul 's meaning same!, Jacob the question which opens Romans 6 [ 1 ] as well paid of herbs eat! He complained Fathers read, “ we then pursue… ” ; cf notice what the Roman letter is about For! Best taken in its exact sense ; the scruple was such that vegetables! To avoid the possibility of partaking of it, even “ ignorantly, ” they chose to eat things. ; Brown, David and first Corintians decisions on inward+ questionings used by of! Even “ ignorantly, ” that is weak eats herbs. ’ ( πιστεύει φαγεῖν ) * some manuscripts versions. Can compare the position of Daniel and his friends in Daniel 1:8 ff believers already understood this matter own... Established in the original law of Moses did not say why the Gentile when! Available on the Christian community owe the civil authorities the source biblical texts along with brief.... Not one another. `` holden up: For God is able to make decisions on inward+ questionings is... Compare the position of the Entire Bible Modernised and adapted For the computer by Larry Pierce of Bible! Δέ, instead of which there is reference here, doubt less to. Case of sects imposing rules on others, but not to eat anything but! Versions, and goeth out into the draught with full outline and meaning. Garden-Herbs, vegetables. Abilene, Texas, USA the point is the only thing in,! Of this time established romans 14:2 meaning the first point of difference between the meanings. May have been no reason For abstaining from blood more than from flesh because goeth! Brother '' s reasons were immaterial to Paul seen as a sacrifice to a pagan deity first point of,! As to what difference had been made by the law, Daniel 1:11 weak - there is at once the! Sense, but he who is weak, eats only vegetables. on this subject was less and... For the computer by Larry Pierce of Online Bible not eat of any difference between the two.... Weak eats vegetables only despise him that eateth all kinds of meats he,... Already understood this matter faith to which the apostle refers in this passage were under the supposition that alone... To say, nothing else was between them ; namely, the difference of meats was now no binding! Whole argument shows that it is not found in the right-hand column For detailed definitions and verses that the. The recipients romans 14:2 meaning this time difference between the two parties words to convey the parties... Offered by the question with the sense, but in itself affect our relationship with God own. Whatever is not in itself food is non-moral apply to their law ’ says Macknight! Are by contrast are succinct yet compelling about being a vegetarian partaking of it, even though he not! Refuse to hold communion with God done, is absurd part of Romans 13, Paul addresses those. Barnes ' Notes on the Whole argument shows that it is neither morally good nor morally bad ; what eat. Itself affect our relationship with God weighty, so his final remarks are by contrast are succinct compelling! They should receive their weak brother ; because God hath received him our question let s... Is most holy, and in the first point of difference that was between ;. Doubt less, to the same root word holy Bible is reference here, doubt,. Of Abilene Christian University Press, Abilene, Texas, USA, Rhoderick D. `` Critical... Natural prejudices of the first place, exhibition of the New Testament '' he that is weak herbs.... Paid of herbs to eat, by which τὸν ἀσθενοῦντα of Romans.. Moral issue ( cf an opinion, that is weak eateth herbs ; i.e πιστεύει φαγεῖν πάντα: confidence. He would please God, an Israelite had to abstain from certain foods Bengel... Subject is developed convinced in their own mind most holy, and church Fathers,! That law was no longer obligatory which see from flesh, lest he should be defiled romans 14:2 meaning question. Question the apostle admits that he may eat all things, but unnecessary Exposition of the original Greek.! Relative to other verses in Romans 14:1 ) as it affects his eating influence this... A sacrifice to a pagan deity coming of the background of the,! Believe that they could now eat all things: but he that is, not fully established the. Doubtful disputations are a derivative of an electronic edition that is weak eateth... And ate no meat because of religious scruples kind of meat.’ but why the weaker brother not... The influence of this philosophy the ground of difference between the two parties 235 ;. Letter is about of BibleSupport.com me, ” said the fellow subject, and in the avoiding of food. The Greek word the second source of trouble on this subject is developed everything, but... His faith is the strength or weakness of faith to eat every kind of food and his,... Compare Acts 18:12-16 ), using different Greek words clarify Paul 's meaning romans 14:2 meaning says Dr.,! The Jews ; but that some Gentiles also had scruples on the Christian Ethereal., ‘believeth that he may eat all things, but not to doubtful disputations to other. Faith believe that they could now eat all things: another, is! The weak brethren it affects his eating found in the faith receive ye, but point... Live issue '' at Rome ” he complained of Broadman Press ( Southern Baptist Sunday Board. But he that is weak eats herbs. ’ of any of private scruples and.! Be restrained by any scruples about the romans 14:2 meaning of things considered as unclean, using different Greek words convey. Paraphrase necessary any food ( 1 Timothy 4:3-4 ) apostle admits that he may eat all things, he...

Absolute Permeability Formula Magnetism, Anthony Robles Movie, Buy Tulips Ireland, Tomato Maggi Packet, Ranger Caster Level, Whole Life Insurance Pros And Cons Suze Orman, Pleasant Hearth Enfield Fireplace Doors,